Picture

How will CSA impact you?

CSA regulations have significant implications for the industry, which can be potentially very costly for fleets. Now is the time to learn more how the CSA works and how on-board technology systems can reduce the impact on your fleet.

What is CSA? With the Compliance Safety Accountability program (CSA, formerly known as Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010) the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), together with state partners and industry will work to further reduce commercial vehicle (CMV) crashes, fatalities, and injuries on our Nation's highways. CSA will enable FMCSA and its state partners to assess the safety performance of a greater segment of the industry and to intervene with more carriers to change unsafe behavior early. The Safety Measurement System (SMS) will replace the past Safety Status (SafeStat) measurement system as FMCSA's tool to identify high-risk motor carriers.

How it will work. Under CSA, SMS will evaluate the safety of individual motor carriers by considering all safety-based roadside inspection violations, not just out-of service violations, as well as State-reported crashes, using 24 months of performance data. SMS will assess each carrier's safety performance in each of the Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories (BASICs): Unsafe Driving, Fatigued Driving (Hours-of-Service), Driver Fitness, Controlled Substances/Alcohol, Vehicle Maintenance, Cargo-Related, and Crash Indicator. SMS calculates a measure for each BASIC by combining the time and severity weighted violations/crashes normalized by exposure. Applying a similar approach to that used in SafeStat, SMS converts each carrier's BASIC measures into percentiles based on rank relative to peers. The CSA Operational Model will involve a more comprehensive measurement system, a proposed safety fitness determination methodology that is based on performance data, and a comprehensive intervention process designed to more efficiently and effectively correct safety problems.

 

Arlington, Va. – American Trucking Associations’ leaders expressed serious concern over the recent decision by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, after pressure from anti-truck groups, to continue to hold the trucking industry responsible in its CSA program for every truck-involved crash, including those which the truck driver could not have prevented.

“With FMCSA moving ahead with its CSA carrier oversight system, it is more important than ever that the agency uses not only the best data, but also common sense to ensure it is targeting the right carriers and drivers for oversight,” ATA President and CEO Bill Graves said. “By backtracking on their commitment to implement a crash accountability determination process in early 2012 to hold carriers accountable for crashes clearly caused by the actions or inactions of a truck driver, FMCSA has bowed to anti-industry interest groups and unfairly called into question the integrity of police accident reports prepared by America’s law enforcement community.”

ATA, and other industry groups, had respectfully requested – and FMCSA had agreed to develop a process where police accident reports would be reviewed to determine crash accountability and remove non-preventable crashes from a carrier’s CSA profile. After pressure from some special interest groups who have questioned the reliability of police accident reports, FMCSA now has shelved these plans. Legitimate highway safety stakeholders know that much of this country’s traffic safety research is based on police accident reports.

FMCSA’s research and data find that when driver actions are cited as a main reason for a car-truck collision, the driver of the smaller, non-commercial vehicle is cited in a majority of cases.

Under FMCSA’s “blame truck drivers first” policy, carriers have had their CSA scores elevated for these crashes, and many, many others like them:

  • A December 2011 crash where the driver of a stolen SUV being pursued by police crashed into the back of a tank truck.
  • A January 2012 crash involving a Utah State student who was texting and Facebook messaging when she rear-ended a tank truck.
  • A February 2012 crash in Pennsylvania where an SUV traveling the wrong way on Interstate 70 collided with a tractor-trailer traveling in the proper direction.
  • A February 2012 crash in Tennessee where an SUV crossed the median of Interstate 40 and struck a tractor-trailer traveling in the opposite direction.

“Every fleet dreads word that one of their trucks and drivers has been involved in a crash,” said ATA Chairman Dan England, chairman of C.R. England, Salt Lake City. “Every day, companies and drivers are working hard to make sure our roads are as safe as they can be, which is why ATA has supported FMCSA in its effort to improve carrier oversight through CSA. However, we all know that not every crash involving one of our trucks can be prevented by the truck driver, so we’ve been making the common sense, reasonable request for several years that FMCSA hold us accountable for what we can prevent and not hold us accountable in the CSA program for crashes we simply cannot prevent. Unfortunately, it seems that FMCSA wants to side with special interests rather than with law enforcement and thousands of safety conscious carriers in this country.”

American Trucking Associations is the largest national trade association for the trucking industry. Through a federation of 50 affiliated state trucking associations and industry-related conferences and councils, ATA is the voice of the industry America depends on most to move our nation’s freight. Follow ATA on Twitter or on Facebook. Good stuff. Trucks Bring It!

Connect with PeopleNet

TwitterLinked InEmail